Writer Profile

Kazuhiro Marushima
Professor, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tokyo City UniversitySpecialization / History, Japanese Medieval History

Kazuhiro Marushima
Professor, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tokyo City UniversitySpecialization / History, Japanese Medieval History
The current international situation is far from stable. However, when we consider "when and why it became unstable," an answer does not come immediately. For people living in the same era, it is not easy to understand when the turning point was or what the cause was.
When I say I study the Sengoku period and Sengoku daimyo, I am often asked about the achievements of Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Those conversations are enjoyable, but the true appeal of the Sengoku period lies in the ability to examine the transition from the medieval era¡ªwhere resolution through violence was taken for granted¡ªto the early modern era, which was more restrained in the use of violence.
However, one can easily fall into the trap of drawing an "orderly story." While academia is a logical endeavor, actual human movements are not. In the political science I studied at Hiyoshi, the theme that remains most memorable was "Do humans always act rationally?"
Below, I would like to re-examine the Siege of Osaka, in which the Edo Shogunate destroyed Toyotomi Hideyori. In fact, Tokugawa Ieyasu did not intend to destroy Toyotomi Hideyori from the beginning. It seems he wanted Hideyori to leave Osaka Castle, disband the gathered ronin (masterless samurai), and move to Yamato (Nara Prefecture), settling down as a daimyo under the Edo Shogunate system. Yamato was a province once ruled by Hideyori's uncle, Toyotomi Hidenaga, and could be called a place with ties to the Toyotomi family. It was not a bad deal.
However, Ieyasu's intentions did not reach Toyotomi Hideyori and his biological mother, Yodo-dono. The young Hideyori was dragged along by radicals around him and expelled the moderates who were trying to arrange a peace settlement with the Shogunate. The expulsion of the person in charge of negotiations is equivalent to closing an embassy in modern terms. To Ieyasu's eyes, it appeared as a rejection of diplomacy, and Hideyori hurriedly made excuses. In other words, the Winter Campaign of the Siege of Osaka can be seen as having started in a way that even Ieyasu did not desire.
Therefore, peace negotiations continued even after the Winter Campaign. Just before the Summer Campaign, Hideyori and his mother decided to accept Ieyasu's demands. However, they could not implement the core condition of the peace: the disbanding of the ronin. They could not suppress the pressure from the ronin. Judging that Hideyori lacked the capacity to act as a responsible party, Ieyasu terminated the negotiations and destroyed the Toyotomi family in the Summer Campaign.
However, Hideyori's seppuku was not Ieyasu's order. It was an instruction from the second shogun, Tokugawa Hidetada. Ieyasu left the decision to his son and "ran away."
What we can see from the process of the Siege of Osaka and the fall of Toyotomi Hideyori is the reality that nothing proceeded according to anyone's specific intentions. The attitude of seeking easy-to-understand answers is perhaps the very thing we should avoid most.
*Affiliations and titles are those at the time of publication.